|

Theme For English B
Something is missing. Just look at tragedy. Tragedy used to be about
responsibility. Now people think it’s when a bunch of people die.
Let’s look at three images of tragedy:
Image #1: Did you see The Titanic, the story about the unsinkable ship
that sank? Was the Titanic’s fall tragic? I can almost see the headlines
now, “Tragedy! Titanic Sinks!” But what makes the sinking of the Titanic
tragic? Was it the large number of people who died? Was it the fact that
it was a freak accident, a surprise? Was it because it was terrible?
No. These things are not tragic; they are much closer to being
melodramatic. The Titanic was cast as the hero, the flawless creation of
modern science that was ready to take on the villain: Mother Nature. The
villain had sunk many ships killing many innocent people, damsels in
distress, but not the Titanic -- its creators were full of pride, so
sure that it was the epitome of perfection and proof that human’s
creations were more powerful than God’s.
But the fact is, it sank. And who was to blame? Was it the iceberg’s
fault? If its fall was only due to the iceberg, than we have a
melodrama, not a tragedy. The iceberg is the villain dressed in black;
the passengers play the innocent victims; and the hero, the titanic
dressed in white, goes down. At the end of the day there is a moral:
black clothing is bad and white clothing is good, the hero is the hero
and the villain is the villain. Nothing more is considered here and at
the end of the day there is only the hope that, while the battle was
lost, people wearing white clothing will win the war. This is clearly
melodramatic.
How could we make the Titanic’s fall tragic? The creators must realize
their responsibility for their own fall. For its fall to be tragic we’d
have to rewrite our play. In our play the Titanic would still be built
with the desire to conquer Mother Nature, to tame the wilderness, to
prove that God is not so powerful. That same iceberg would hit the
Titanic; and yes, the Titanic would still sink. People all over the
world would realize that it had sunk and they would be terrified. At
first they would blame the iceberg and the terror it caused. Then they
would blame the builders of the ship, accuse them of sabotage and call
them iceberg-lovers. They would blame everyone they could think of --
even a three-legged dog with no fleas. So far, not much has changed in
our story.
But here’s what we would add if we wanted to write a tragedy: when all
of their plans seemed to be sunk they had a realization: their pride had
caused their own fall; they could not give all of the blame to Mother
Nature, who was not the villain as they were not the heroes when they
were trying to conquer Her, tame Her, and blame Her for all that was
evil.
Unlike melodrama, in tragedy we have this realization in which we take
responsibility for our own fall. The Greeks, who were heavily influenced
by cultures all around the Mediterranean and the Horn of Africa,
referred to this realization as a catharsis. Translations of Aristotle’s
Poetics claim that it is “the purgation of pity and fear.” It is pity
for the sinking ship -- a representation of its creators’ pride and it
is the fear that you, too, could be responsible for your own fall and
that you, too, could be sinking. Unlike melodrama, we do not end with a
moral that reaffirms a man-made morality. In tragedy, we end with a
catharsis, a realization, a confrontation with a truth that may be so
intense we may have to at worst, poke out our eyes, go mad, turn to
stone, or kill ourselves. This is how much of Greek, Roman, and British
tragedy ends. But there is another possibility: the truth we realize
could inform how we live; we could let ourselves become the truths we
know; we could have a catharsis and through our realization we could
evolve.
Image #2: In the beginning there was a king who was too prideful and his
pride blinded him -- he wouldn’t listen to how anybody else was feeling
and so little by little he began to fall. He lost his castle, he lost
his purple robe, and he lost his crown. At first he blamed others. He
kept blaming others even as he neared the bottom. Just as he was about
to reach the very bottom he realized how far he had fallen and he began
to wonder why. As he searched within himself he saw something
terrifying. At first he looked away, but a part of him felt drawn
towards it. He finally got the courage to look up at what he was afraid
to see and what he saw is what he knew: he had responsibility for his
own fall. Some say that the truth was too much for him and that he died
instantly. Others say he poked out his eyes. But others say that he
survived his realization—that what he saw helped him to better know
himself, to evolve.
Image #3: The twin towers fall and everyone agrees that it is terrible.
No one I know thinks it isn’t terrible. But the play that is written
claims that the planes are to blame, they are dressed in black; the
victims inside are damsels in distress and the US becomes the heroes
dressed in white. At the end of the day we can expect a moral to the
story: white clothing is good and black clothing is bad, and damsels are
lucky that people wearing white protect them from harms way. But this is
clearly melodramatic.
How can 9-11 become tragic? By now we know that it involves a
realization. The US must realize how it caused its own fall, how it has
responsibility for the falling of the twin towers. And through this fall
an opportunity exists: we could look at all of the genocide and instead
of blaming, forgetting, or going to war we could evolve, we could ask
ourselves the question, “How did the US cause the fall of the twin
towers?” and we may find ourselves asking a very difficult question:
“When did the war in Iraq begin?”
Unlike tragedy, melodrama does not end with these questions. Melodrama
does not see the history behind the fall; it sees the fall as an
isolated event; it loves to see history as a series of isolated events
arranged in a chronological order. It only wants us to consider the
image of the twin towers falling again and again. When we ask, “What
happened?” it only responds with one answer, “Can’t you see? Those
planes are to blame! Just look at that frame again and again.” In
melodrama we never question the heroes or the perceived innocence of the
victim. In melodrama there is no catharsis, no movement within us. In
melodrama evolution is not possible. |
|
Our Sponsors
(please check
them out.)
|
|