mission.    subscribe.     live.     blogs.    study.    visualart.    music.    film.    store.    advertise.    contribute.    contact.

Liberator 4.1
Is It What You See? Or, How You See It?
words: Brian Katz
 



“Womanism is to feminism as purple is to lavender.”—Alice Walker

What do you see? I see Lake Street. What is Lake Street? Is it a concrete road? Is it the cars, the trash, a broken clarinet? Is it the crow’s crow or is it the crow that makes Lake Street Lake Street?

Here is a million dollars: How would you paint Lake Street?

I wanted to paint Lake Street. Mercado Central. I began by painting the brightly colored walls, the windows, the doors, the exterior of the building. And a man claiming to be Ronald Takaki said to me, “You forgot to paint the people inside, their eyes, their hands, their hair being braided. You forgot to paint how they are working in Minnesota in the late 1800s. Can you see them after World War I in meat packing plants in South Saint Paul? You forgot to paint the U.S. dollar and the mothers of mothers of Mexican soldiers who fought in U.S. wars. What about the border changing? What about the border lights? What about Taco Bell? What about everything that came before Cortez? You forgot to paint their gods. You forgot to paint their mathematicians and astrologers, their medicine, their farmers and their families. There, they are praying and giving birth. What about the Aztecs, the Mayans, the Olmecs, the birth of the earth, the sun, the moon and the stars? And where may I ask is God in your painting?

“You’re going to need a bigger canvas”, he said, “ and some red paint because after the President ordered troops to ‘tame the wilderness’ and push the Mexicans out of Texas in 1845, an American General admitted that he and his troops ‘committed atrocities [that would] make heaven weep and every American of Christian morals blush for his country. Murder, robbery, and rape of mothers and daughters in the presence of tied-up males of the families have been common all along the Rio Grande.’

“After California was carved out of Mexico, Forty-niners flocked to the gold rush state in search of wealth. Unlike miners who were given citizenship, the Mexican and Chinese miners were charged an extra ‘foreign miners tax’. By 1870, the Chinese alone contributed more than five million dollars to California in taxes. After the government repealed this tax, they created the Chinese Exclusion Act—it’s really a matter of giving with the left hand while taking with the right. Paint the Chinese agricultural laborers organizing, protesting, and demanding higher wages; and then you’ll need to paint the number of Mexican agricultural laborers increasing and receiving lower wages than the Chinese. The one thing the owners always feared was inter-racial cooperation.

“It isn’t difficult to see: White America needed cheap labor after slavery was abolished in 1865 to preserve their supervisor positions in the caste. So in the South, African Americans became economic slaves through Jim Crow, the convict-lease system, and the share cropping system. Like African Americans, Mexicans worked as share-croppers and were subjected to usury, which left them dependent upon a system that kept them enslaved. This only happened after White ranchers were able to buy the land from Mexican ranchers by manipulating tax laws and by denying them access to loans. When the Mexican ranchers went broke, the White ranchers bought their land for a real steal. Just as Nazis in Germany manipulated laws so that everything in Auschwitz was legal, America manipulated or broke laws for profit and for the preservation of the caste; America governs by any means necessary but expects its citizens and non-citizens to be ethical. And of course, this happened after slaughter, broken treaties, and disease pushed Native Americans onto reservations and out of the way of development. But that’s another story.

“You’ll have to paint the Chinese laborers, too, and paint their wives in China. Because unlike the Mexicans, most Chinese were not allowed to bring their wives—if they did, how could the government convince them to leave after they did so much of the most dangerous work excavating mines, building the railroads, and clearing land for agriculture in the Southwest?

“If you have any red left, you’ll need to paint ‘1890: Divide and Conquer’ because by 1890 more layers to the caste were created as European immigrants such as Jews, Italians, Irish and Poles needed to be placed in the workforce. Like the influx of European immigrants, Mexican immigrants came in hopes of escaping the injustice of usury, debt, and the share cropping systems in their native lands. But unlike the Mexican immigrants, White labor unions eventually protected the European immigrants’ place in ‘skilled’ jobs and supervisor positions thus contributing to America’s racially based caste system. In the 1920s a Mexican worker said, ‘I have gone from one place to another working as a laborer for I haven’t found anything else because the masons’ union don’t want to admit Mexicans…But although I have worked as a laborer I have always tried to learn everything that I could. I have worked in cement, in a brick-yard, laying pipes...and have learned all that sort of work, even how to make entrances and walks for a garage with an incline. All that will do me some good in Mexico.’

“We haven’t even discussed the formation of Mexican workers’ unions or their relationship to the U.S. government’s repatriation project that sought to send Mexicans back to Mexico after the Great Depression in order to create more jobs for White workers. White America wanted the Chinese to leave after the work was done and they expected the Mexicans to leave, too. But once the economy was restored White workers quickly returned to supervisor positions and agents entered Mexico to bring back a labor force for the owners because “The White people won’t do the work and they won’t live as the Mexicans do on beans and tortillas and in one room shacks.” The agents brought more workers than they had jobs for, and the surplus of unemployed non-citizens allowed owners to hire the workers who would work for the lowest wage. Because Mexican men, unlike the Chinese, often brought their wives and children, many found themselves working for next-to-nothing to ensure that their children’s stomachs were kept full. Mexican women workers frequently carried a baby on their back while working in the fields during the day and would cook, clean, and tend to their children at night. Finding a job was not as easy as picking up a phone or driving a car back then—this made it difficult for Mexican workers who wanted to look for a better living. Those who did have cars were routinely pulled over by the police, who would fine them and place them back at their jobs to work off their newly acquired debt.

Like the South, schools in the Southwest were also segregated. While some dedicated and caring teachers did their best to give young Mexicans a decent education that could help them break through the caste order; others used school to re-produce an obedient work force. A Texan farmer claimed, ‘If every Mexican child has a high school education…who will labor? They would make more desirable citizens if they would stop about the seventh grade.’

“How can you stand on Lake Street without its history? Without the love, commitment, hard work, and struggle of Mexicans and Mexican Americans, this street and even you do not exist here.” And then he quoted Octavio Paz, a Mexican poet who said, “All is presence. All of the centuries are present in this moment.”

Here I am with a paintbrush in my hand. Building with Asha Taylor’s article on Frida Kahlo, Kindred, and Emily Dikinson. I believe that we are trying to see how people across time and place relate as we individually and collectively create our reality. I want to paint Frida’s husband, Diego Rivera. The media loves to say that men of color cheat on their wives. And the recent Hollywood version of her life (that almost cast Madonna or JLo as Frida Kahlo) depicts Diego as a no-good adulterer who loves to paint nude women -- including his wife’s sister. But what don’t we see in this Selma Hayek film and in some of the biographies that frame her life?

My eyes can only see so far, but I went to Mexico and saw many of Diego’s murals and spoke with some Mexicans about the murals. Diego didn’t start out painting murals. In 1906 he received money to study art in Spain where he learned to paint portraits of the wealthy, bowls of fruit, landscapes, virgins, and saints. He learned fresco and cubism. But I saw these paintings and felt that his painting was painting his painting, not his heart.

But when Diego returned from Europe and joined with other muralists such as Jose Clemente Orozco and David Alfero Siqueiros to support the Revolution in the 1920s, he was not in the mood for bowls of fruit in Spain, instead he exclaimed, “I want the murals to be a mirror of Mexican life. I believe we need a revolutionary art that speaks to and about the reality of our country.” Indeed, he believed that art does not exist for art’s sake, but rather to create social and political change. And did you know that he and other Mexican muralists went to Harlem in the 1930s and worked with African American artists? There is a Rivera mural in the Ford plant in Detroit.

Can you imagine the White House covered with murals, pictures of the Pope with a bag of gold, images of prostitutes, pickpockets, and slave labor, images of Aztec civilization coloring the White House walls? In Mexico, it is so. Murals cover the walls of government buildings, churches, libraries, universities, and museums, too. Rivera paints grotesque pictures of skeletons dressed in rich clothes. He shows our greed, war, and death, and offers ideas of how we can survive together through cooperation in this modern industrial world. He paints the soldier, the field worker, and the factory worker united. The field workers wear sombreros that halo over their heads. He shows Mexicans building community, cooperating, working, cooking, protecting each another, men, women, children, and elders. The people he paints are standing in places: factories, cornfields, ancient pyramids, parks, street scenes, battlefields, rich people’s parties, revolutions, and family dinners. In his paintings men help women and women help men carry large burdens on their backs: baskets full of calla lilies.

In the middle of Figure 1 a baby is bundled on its mother’s back. The baby is the hope; the baby is the future. But, next to the baby’s head is a slaughtered pig. How is the baby like the pig? Once you can imagine how a baby is like a slaughtered pig, can you imagine how those men in the background are hanging from trees? What makes slave labor thinkable—that man in the corner being branded or the ones who watch? How is the brand related to those bags of gold? And why is a sword pointed at the man who points the sword? Is the killer killed when the killer kills? And up in the corner, that pregnant woman with a sword to her belly and a bible to her ear—is it Jesus she’s being given or is it a sword she is being asked to swallow?

What is the relationship between how we think abut time and how we think about the woman? These murals that show how things across time and place relate—that show that things do not exist in isolation—are these murals not a womanist statement?

It is true that Rivera painted a nude picture of Kahlo’s sister and they say that he slept with her, too. Should we not see that he paints Frida as a revolutionary leader, in the center of one of his murals, just as she paints his face in the center of her forehead? Should we forget that he painted Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, a 16th Century Mexican nun and intellectual who rebelled against the Catholic Church through her reading and writing, her poetry and philosophy? She, like the woman who is teaching (Fig. 2) fought for women’s rights to read, write, think, and teach. Many see her rebellion as a catalyst for modern womanist movements. She is one of many characters he portrays in his murals, his histories, his five-hundred year maps—some going back much further than that. Reading them is like reading Octavio Paz, who reminds us that things do not exist in isolation. Everything, all of the centuries are here, they are all part of this moment. What do you see?

Here is a million dollars: How would you paint Lake Street?

Our Sponsors
(please check them out.)